On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:20:39 -0700 Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/19/22 15:35, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:11:39 -0700 > > Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 12/19/22 13:57, Ross Zwisler wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >>>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> With the new filter logic of passing in the name of a function to match an > >>>> instruction pointer (or the address of the function), add a test to make > >>>> sure that it is functional. > >>>> > >>>> This is also the first test to test plain filtering. The filtering has > >>>> been tested via the trigger logic, which uses the same code, but there was > >>>> nothing to test just the event filter, so this test is the first to add > >>>> such a case. > >>>> > >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Cc: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thank you both. I will apply this after rc1 comes out. > > > > It's dependent on the first patch. > > > > In which case, > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks Shuah! -- Steve
