On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 3:31 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/15/22 15:09, Kyle Huey wrote: > > Following last week's discussion I've reorganized this patch. The goal > > remains to restore the pre-5.14 behavior of ptrace(PTRACE_SET_REGSET, > > NT_X86_XSTATE) for the PKRU register (which was equivalent to a hardware > > XRSTOR instruction). > > The new version looks great. I've applied it. > > I did remove the stable@ tags for now. There were a couple reasons for > that. First, most of the x86 stuff marked for stable@ goes via our > tip/urgent branch and this doesn't seem super urgent. It also touches > code that's exposed in at least three separate UABIs, so I want a bit > more soak time than x86/urgent normally provides. > > I have zero objections if anyone wants to submit it to stable@ after it > hits Linus's tree. Works for me, thanks. - Kyle
