On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:46 PM Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - As Daniel mentioned, can we think of a better placeholder name for > > tests without Subtest lines? One thought is to just leave it as the > > empty string? > > I am definitely open to changing this placeholder name. > > The ideas I thought of are: "Test suite", just "Test", or just an > empty string. "Test" or empty string may be less confusing. What do > people prefer? I'd prefer the empty string. So it would show up as something like ===== (1 subtests) ===== [PASSED] case1 ====== suite1 ====== Note: we'll just have to make sure to avoid a leading space (e.g. we're currently doing message += f' (1 subtest)' ) Daniel
