On 11/8/22 12:35 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 11/8/22 11:52 AM, Francis Laniel wrote:
From: Alban Crequy <albancrequy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If a page fault occurs while copying the first byte, this function
resets one
byte before dst.
As a consequence, an address could be modified and leaded to kernel
crashes if
case the modified address was accessed later.
Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <albancrequy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Francis Laniel <flaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/maccess.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/maccess.c b/mm/maccess.c
index 5f4d240f67ec..074f6b086671 100644
--- a/mm/maccess.c
+++ b/mm/maccess.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ long strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(char *dst, const
void *unsafe_addr, long count)
return src - unsafe_addr;
Efault:
pagefault_enable();
- dst[-1] = '\0';
+ dst[0] = '\0';
What if the fault is due to dst, so the above won't work, right?
The original code should work fine if the first byte copy is successful.
For the first byte copy fault, maybe just to leave it as is?
Okay, the dst is always safe (from func signature), so change looks okay
to me. Probably mm people can double check.
return -EFAULT;
}
--
2.25.1
