On 10/13/2022 7:26 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
On 10/11/22 5:01 AM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
xdp_adjust_tail.c calls ASSERT_OK() to check the return value of
bpf_prog_test_load(), but the condition is not correct. Fix it.
Fixes: 791cad025051 ("bpf: selftests: Get rid of CHECK macro in xdp_adjust_tail.c")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c
index 009ee37607df..39973ea1ce43 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink(void)
);
err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd);
- if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink"))
return;
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow(void)
);
err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd);
- if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
Ouch... ic. It is why this test has been passing.
Well, it's because the value of err is zero, so ASSERT_OK passed.
return;
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow2(void)
);
err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd);
- if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
return;
/* Test case-64 */
.
