Hi Reinette,
> On 9/27/2022 2:01 AM, tan.shaopeng@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> On 9/13/2022 6:51 PM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> >>> There is a comment "Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run"
> >>> in function mbm_setup(), but the condition "num_of_runs == 0" will
> >>> never be met and write_schemata() will never be called to set
> >>> schemata to 100%.
> >>
> >> Thanks for catching this.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Since umount/mount resctrl file system is run on each resctrl test,
> >>> at the same time the default schemata will also be set to 100%.
> >>
> >> This is the case when a test is run with struct
> >> resctrl_val_param->mum_resctrlfs == 1, but if the test is run with
> >> struct resctrl_val_param->mum_resctrlfs == 0 then resctrl filesystem
> >> will not be remounted.
> >>
> >> I do think that this setup function should support both cases.
> >
> > In mbm test(mbm_test.c), resctrl_val_param.mum_resctrlfs is set to 1
> > and never be changed, and umount/mount resctrl file system is always
> executed.
> > So it is not necessary to run "if (num_of_runs == 0)".
>
> This is true for the current usage. You could also add a warning here ("running
> test with stale config") if a future test sets mum_resctrlfs - but with all the
> current output of the selftests a warning may be lost in the noise.
>
> I think it would just be simpler to support both cases. Having the tests be more
> robust is good.
I understand that mum_resctrlfs should support both cases(0&1).
However, "num_of_runs++" is executed before "if (num_of_runs == 0)",
So write_schemata() is never executed regardless of mum_rectrlfs is 0 or 1.
97 if (num_of_runs++ >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
105 if (num_of_runs == 0)
106 ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", p->cpu_no,
I will fix this in the next version
Best Regards,
Shaopeng
