On 2022-09-21 09:15, Ido Schimmel wrote:
# Check blackhole entries can be replaced. bridge fdb replace `mac_get $h2` dev $swp2 master static bridge fdb get `mac_get $h2` br br0 | grep -q blackhole check_fail $? "Blackhole entry found after replacement"
I am quite in doubt if the driver will be able to overwrite a blackhole entry added by userspace as the replace action must be to delete and then add the replacement afaics, but a NEWNEIGH event using port_fdb_add() will not succeed with that using the ops I use now. Otherwise it has be all with port_fb_add() with new lists keeping the userspace added blackhole fdb entries.
