On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:04:47AM +0000, Vishal Annapurve wrote: > Update the vmcall instruction invocation to happen according to the cpu > type. > > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 8 ++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c | 2 +- > .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c | 2 +- What's the reason to use kvm_hypercall() for these tests? All of these are Intel-specific. i.e. is_amd_cpu() will always return false. > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > index 18a8a6a2b786..74893a7a80f8 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > @@ -833,6 +833,14 @@ void vm_set_page_table_entry(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > uint64_t kvm_hypercall(uint64_t nr, uint64_t a0, uint64_t a1, uint64_t a2, > uint64_t a3); > > +/* > + * Execute vmcall instruction. > + */ > +static inline void vmcall(void) > +{ > + kvm_hypercall(0, 0, 0, 0, 0); > +} > + > void nested_guest_vmcall(void); > > void __vm_xsave_require_permission(int bit, const char *name); > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c > index 5abecf06329e..8180711c8684 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > static void l2_guest_code(void) > { > /* Exit to L1 */ > - __asm__ __volatile__("vmcall"); > + vmcall(); > } > > static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages, unsigned long high_gpa) > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c > index 465a9434d61c..37da9d01d5d6 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static void l2_guest_code(void) > check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L2); > > /* exit to L1 */ > - __asm__ __volatile__("vmcall"); > + vmcall(); > } > > static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages) > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c > index 5943187e8594..00192f564d9b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void l2_guest_code(void) > check_ia32_tsc_adjust(-2 * TSC_ADJUST_VALUE); > > /* Exit to L1 */ > - __asm__ __volatile__("vmcall"); > + vmcall(); > } > > static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages) > -- > 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog >