On 9/14/22 9:12 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 9/14/22 08:36, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote: >> When we initially submitted the attestation patches, virt/coco folder >> was not created. I initially kept this driver in platform/x86/, but >> later moved to arch/x86/coco based on the review comments in v4. There >> was a discussion about the need for a new config and the location of >> the driver. The outcome of that discussion is, since this is not a >> traditional driver, but a basic TDX feature, we don't need a special >> config and the code can be maintained in the arch/x86/coco folder. > > Could you please include the following in this set somewhere: > > "The code to do the SEV analog of this TDX functionality is in > ___insert_path_here____. This code is different from that because > ______reason______ so it is instead placed in ____other_path____." > > ? Ok. I will include it in the cover letter. -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer
