On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> When the number of CPUs that can possibly be brought online is known at
> boot time, e.g. when HOTPLUG is disabled, nr_cpu_ids may be smaller than
> NR_CPUS. In that case, cpu_possible_mask would not be completely filled,
> and cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask) can return false for valid system
> configurations.
It doesn't mean we can just give up. You can check validity of possible
cpumask like this:
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first_zero(&mask_all))
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, NR_CPUS, cpumask_first(&mask_all))
> Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> Rewrite commit message to explain why this test is wrong
>
> lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
> index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644
> --- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
> +++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all;
> static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
> {
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
> --
> 2.37.2
