When arm64 signal context data overflows the base struct sigcontext it gets
placed in an extra buffer pointed to by a record of type EXTRA_CONTEXT in
the base struct sigcontext which is required to be the last record in the
base struct sigframe. The current validation code attempts to check this
by using GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD() to step forward from the current record to
the next but that is a macro which assumes it is being provided with a
struct _aarch64_ctx and uses the size there to skip forward to the next
record. Instead validate_extra_context() passes it a struct extra_context
which has a separate size field. This compiles but results in us trying
to validate a termination record in completely the wrong place, at best
failing validation and at worst just segfaulting. Fix this by passing
the struct _aarch64_ctx we meant to into the macro.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
index 84c36bee4d82..d98828cb542b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ bool validate_extra_context(struct extra_context *extra, char **err)
return false;
fprintf(stderr, "Validating EXTRA...\n");
- term = GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(extra);
+ term = GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(&extra->head);
if (!term || term->magic || term->size) {
*err = "Missing terminator after EXTRA context";
return false;
--
2.30.2
