Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: add KUnit array assertions to the example_all_expect_macros_test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Às 13:12 de 02/08/22, Maíra Canal escreveu:
> Increament the example_all_expect_macros_test with the
> KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_ARRNEQ macros by creating a test
> with array assertions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
> index f8fe582c9e36..fc81a45d9cbc 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ static void example_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test)
>   */
>  static void example_all_expect_macros_test(struct kunit *test)
>  {
> +	const u32 array[] = { 0x0F, 0xFF };
> +	const u32 expected[] = { 0x1F, 0xFF };
> +
>  	/* Boolean assertions */
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, true);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, false);
> @@ -109,6 +112,10 @@ static void example_all_expect_macros_test(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hi", "hi");
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_STRNEQ(test, "hi", "bye");
>  
> +	/* Array assertions */
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ(test, expected, expected, 2);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_ARRNEQ(test, array, expected, 2);

ARRAY_SIZE() is usually better than constants is this case.

> +
>  	/*
>  	 * There are also ASSERT variants of all of the above that abort test
>  	 * execution if they fail. Useful for memory allocations, etc.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux