On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:05:14AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote: > > But again, I'm open to better proposals. I reached the limits of my > > imagination there, but I do value the ability to "yyp" one line, change > > two arguments and gain one extra test for a different combination, and > > I really do not want to lose that simplicity. Note that for more complex > > tests, it's trivial to add a dedicated function and that's what was done > > for getdents64() which also serves as an example. > > OK, I understand the reason behind this now. I and Fernanda will try > to visit this again at around 5.20-rc. *If* we can find a better > design that matches your requirements, we will send you an RFC to > improve it too. You would be very welcome, thank you! Willy
