On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:08 PM Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 07/07/2022 00:01, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > > On 06/07/2022 23:21, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:38:04PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > [snip] > > I already said it's ok to add hard configurable limits if they're done properly performance-wise. > > Any distribution can choose to set some default limits after the option exists. > > > > Just fyi, and to avoid duplicate efforts, I already have patches for global and per-port software > fdb limits that I'll polish and submit soon (depending on time availability, of course). If I find > more time I might add per-vlan limits as well to the set. They use embedded netlink attributes > to config and dump, so we can easily extend them later (e.g. different action on limit hit, limit > statistics etc). > Sounds good, I will just limit the number of locked entries in the driver as they are not controllable from the bridge. :-)
