Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: bridge: ensure that link-local traffic cannot unlock a locked port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



One question though... wouldn't it be an issue that the mentioned
option setting is bridge wide, while the patch applies a per-port
effect?

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 1:38 PM Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:16:34PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> > This patch is related to the patch set
> > "Add support for locked bridge ports (for 802.1X)"
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220223101650.1212814-1-schultz.hans+netdev@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > This patch makes the locked port feature work with learning turned on,
> > which is enabled with the command:
> >
> > bridge link set dev DEV learning on
> >
> > Without this patch, link local traffic (01:80:c2) like EAPOL packets will
> > create a fdb entry when ingressing on a locked port with learning turned
> > on, thus unintentionally opening up the port for traffic for the said MAC.
> >
> > Some switchcore features like Mac-Auth and refreshing of FDB entries,
> > require learning enables on some switchcores, f.ex. the mv88e6xxx family.
> > Other features may apply too.
> >
> > Since many switchcores trap or mirror various multicast packets to the
> > CPU, link local traffic will unintentionally unlock the port for the
> > SA mac in question unless prevented by this patch.
>
> Why not just teach hostapd to do:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/no_linklocal_learn
>
> ?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux