Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: eliminate code-block warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ping. Any progress on this patch?

Thanks.

On 3/31/22 19:47, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix Sphinx complaints about code-block directive missing an argument.
> For start.rst, add "none" since that is already heavily used in that
> file. For run_wrapper.rst, use the simpler "::" literal block instead.
> 
> dev-tools/kunit/start.rst:83: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> 
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:17: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:23: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:31: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:51: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:57: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:78: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:85: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:109: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:116: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:124: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:139: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:162: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> 
> Fixes: c48b9ef1f794 ("Documentation: KUnit: Rewrite getting started")
> Fixes: 46201d47d6c4 ("Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation related to running tests")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Harinder Singh <sharinder@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst |   24 ++++++++--------
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst       |    2 -
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20220331.orig/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
> +++ linux-next-20220331/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
> @@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ tests, and formats the test results.
>  
>  Run command:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
>  
>  We should see the following:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	Generating .config...
>  	Building KUnit kernel...
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ We should see the following:
>  
>  We may want to use the following options:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=30 --jobs=`nproc --all
>  
> @@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ test configs for certain subsystems.
>  To use a different ``.kunitconfig`` file (such as one
>  provided to test a particular subsystem), pass it as an option:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
>  
>  To view kunit_tool flags (optional command-line arguments), run:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --help
>  
> @@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ certain code blocks, arch configs and so
>  
>  To create a ``.kunitconfig``, using the KUnit ``defconfig``:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
>  	cp tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config .kunit/.kunitconfig
>  
>  We can then add any other Kconfig options. For example:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
>  
> @@ -106,14 +106,14 @@ can run part of the KUnit build process
>  When running kunit_tool, from a ``.kunitconfig``, we can generate a
>  ``.config`` by using the ``config`` argument:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
>  
>  To build a KUnit kernel from the current ``.config``, we can use the
>  ``build`` argument:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
>  
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ If we already have built UML kernel with
>  can run the kernel, and display the test results with the ``exec``
>  argument:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec
>  
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ format. When running tests, kunit_tool p
>  a summary. To see the raw test results in TAP format, we can pass the
>  ``--raw_output`` argument:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output
>  
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ By passing a bash style glob filter to t
>  commands, we can run a subset of the tests built into a kernel . For
>  example: if we only want to run KUnit resource tests, use:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +::
>  
>  	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit-resource*'
>  
> --- linux-next-20220331.orig/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> +++ linux-next-20220331/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Running Tests (KUnit Wrapper)
>  
>  If everything worked correctly, you should see the following:
>  
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>  
>  	Generating .config ...
>  	Building KUnit Kernel ...

-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux