Hi! > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.14 release. > > > There are 772 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:48:02 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.14-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.17.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > ... > > We will bisect and let you know more details about this reported problem. > > The bisect script pointed me to this commit and reverted and tested and > confirmed. Can you add some printks into that? Because I'm pretty sure this patch does not break anything. (It should not fix much, either.) > commit 1883088ed4a0d5cc9cea500ca4e89a354ab32c11 > Author: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx> > md: bcache: check the return value of kzalloc() in detached_dev_do_request() > > commit 40f567bbb3b0639d2ec7d1c6ad4b1b018f80cf19 upstream. > > The function kzalloc() in detached_dev_do_request() can fail, so its > return value should be checked. > > Fixes: bc082a55d25c ("bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached ... > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c > @@ -1107,6 +1107,12 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct > bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio, > * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl) > */ > ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO); > + if (!ddip) { > + bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE; > + bio->bi_end_io(bio); > + return; > + } > + > ddip->d = d; > /* Count on the bcache device */ > ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev; > So... for patch to make any difference, memory allocation has to fail and ddip has to be NULL. Before the patch, it would oops in "ddip->d = d;". With the patch, you do some kind of error handling. Even if it is buggy, it should not do more harm than immediate oops. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature