Re: [PATCH] selftests/proc: Fix proc-pid-vm for vsyscall=xonly.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/16/22 3:10 PM, Dylan Hatch wrote:
This test would erroneously fail the /proc/$PID/maps case if
vsyscall=xonly since the existing probe of the vsyscall page only
succeeds if the process has read permissions. Fix this by checking for
either no vsyscall mapping OR an execute-only vsyscall mapping in the
case were probing the vsyscall page segfaults.


Does this fix include skipping the test with a clear message that
says why test is skipped?

Signed-off-by: Dylan Hatch <dylanbhatch@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c
index 28604c9f805c..5ca85520131f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c
@@ -213,9 +213,12 @@ static int make_exe(const uint8_t *payload, size_t len)
static bool g_vsyscall = false; -static const char str_vsyscall[] =
+static const char str_vsyscall_rx[] =
  "ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0                  [vsyscall]\n";
+static const char str_vsyscall_x[] =
+"ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 --xp 00000000 00:00 0                  [vsyscall]\n";
+
  #ifdef __x86_64__
  static void sigaction_SIGSEGV(int _, siginfo_t *__, void *___)
  {
@@ -261,6 +264,7 @@ int main(void)
  	int exec_fd;
vsyscall();
+	const char *str_vsyscall = g_vsyscall ? str_vsyscall_rx : str_vsyscall_x;
atexit(ate); @@ -314,7 +318,8 @@ int main(void) /* Test /proc/$PID/maps */
  	{
-		const size_t len = strlen(buf0) + (g_vsyscall ? strlen(str_vsyscall) : 0);
+		const size_t len_buf0 = strlen(buf0);
+		const size_t len_vsys = strlen(str_vsyscall);
  		char buf[256];
  		ssize_t rv;
  		int fd;
@@ -325,11 +330,16 @@ int main(void)
  			return 1;
  		}
  		rv = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
-		assert(rv == len);
-		assert(memcmp(buf, buf0, strlen(buf0)) == 0);
  		if (g_vsyscall) {
-			assert(memcmp(buf + strlen(buf0), str_vsyscall, strlen(str_vsyscall)) == 0);
+			assert(rv == len_buf0 + len_vsys);
+		} else {
+			/* If vsyscall isn't readable, it's either x-only or not mapped at all */
+			assert(rv == len_buf0 + len_vsys || rv == len_buf0);
  		}
+		assert(memcmp(buf, buf0, len_buf0) == 0);
+		/* Check for vsyscall mapping if buf is long enough */
+		if (rv == len_buf0 + len_vsys)
+			assert(memcmp(buf + len_buf0, str_vsyscall, len_vsys) == 0);
  	}
/* Test /proc/$PID/smaps */


The change looks good to me. Doesn't look like it skips the test though?

thanks,
-- Shuah



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux