Re: [PATCH] selftests/arm64: Fix mismerge of Makefile for fp tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 04:14:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The FP Makefile defines two TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED instead of one of them and one
> one TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED for the programs that need compilation. Fix
> that.
> 
> Fixes: a59f7a7f76407da78 ("selftests/arm64: Use TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED in the FP Makefile")
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> index a41fef2c9669..36db61358ed5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS := fp-stress \
>  	sve-ptrace sve-probe-vls \
>  	vec-syscfg \
>  	za-fork za-ptrace
> -TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := fp-pidbench fpsimd-test \
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED := fp-pidbench fpsimd-test \
>  	rdvl-sme rdvl-sve \
>  	sve-test \
>  	ssve-test \

Do we still need this? The fixed commit already uses
TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED and that's what it seems to be in current
mainline. Unless there was a mismerge in -next (I haven't checked).

-- 
Catalin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux