On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 06:29:55PM +0200, Michal Koutny wrote: > The memory protection test setup and runtime is almost equal for > memory.low and memory.min cases. > It makes modification of the common parts prone to mistakes, since the > protections are similar not only in setup but also in principle, factor > the common part out. > > Past exceptions between the tests: > - missing memory.min is fine (kept), > - test_memcg_low protected orphaned pagecache (adapted like > test_memcg_min and we keep the processes of protected memory running). > > The evaluation in two tests is different (OOM of allocator vs low events > of protégés), this is kept different. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
