Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Explicitly build no BTI tests with BTI disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 05:10:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> In case a distribution enables branch protection by default do as we do for
> the main kernel and explicitly disable branch protection when building the
> test case for having BTI disabled to ensure it doesn't get turned on by the
> toolchain defaults.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/Makefile | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/Makefile
> index 10a12c5e05e6..a3e59d7910b3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/Makefile
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include/
>  
>  CFLAGS_STATIC = -ffreestanding
>  
> -CFLAGS_NOBTI = -DBTI=0
> +CFLAGS_NOBTI = -mbranch-protection=none -DBTI=0
>  CFLAGS_BTI = -mbranch-protection=standard -DBTI=1

Do I miss an patches? I can't see the CFLAGS_STATIC in the arm64
branches, nor in next.

-- 
Catalin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux