On 2022-05-11 14:48, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
On 2022-05-11 02:59, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:21 PM Maxim Mikityanskiy
<maximmi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2022-05-07 00:51, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
Is it expected that your selftests will fail on s390x? Please check [0]
I see it fails with:
test_synproxy:FAIL:ethtool -K tmp0 tx off unexpected error: 32512
(errno 2)
errno 2 is ENOENT, probably the ethtool binary is missing from the s390x
image? When reviewing v6, you said you added ethtool to the CI image.
Maybe it was added to x86_64 only? Could you add it to s390x?
Could be that it was outdated in s390x, but with [0] just merged in it
should have pretty recent one.
Do you mean the image was outdated and didn't contain ethtool? Or
ethtool was in the image, but was outdated? If the latter, I would
expect it to work, this specific ethtool command has worked for ages.
Hi Andrii,
Could you reply this question? I need to understand whether I need to
make any changes to the CI before resubmitting.
Thanks,
Max
