Hi David, On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 4:05 PM David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I definitely agree here -- I can't recall any particular plan that > would require this to be non-const, and we can always change it back > if we really need to. That is good to know, thanks! Out-of-tree users can always be a surprise... :) > Very exciting! I assume that's the PR here: > https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/757 Indeed! I hope you like it -- we are taking the documentation tests in Rust (which are a very lightweight way of writing examples which double as tests) and generating KUnit test cases on the fly. For the moment it is just for the `kernel` crate, but the idea is to generalize it for modules etc. By the way, since you saw the PR... do you know if KUnit relies (or will rely) on "stack-dumping" functions like `longjmp`? Cheers, Miguel
