On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 11:00:19AM +0800, David Gow wrote: > KUnit tests are not supposed to run on production systems: they may do > deliberately illegal things to trigger errors, and have security > implications (assertions will often deliberately leak kernel addresses). > > Add a new taint type, TAINT_KUNIT to signal that a KUnit test has been > run. This will be printed as 'N' (for kuNit, as K, U and T were already > taken). > > This should discourage people from running KUnit tests on production > systems, and to make it easier to tell if tests have been run > accidentally (by loading the wrong configuration, etc.) > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
