Currently, the kfence test suite could not run via "normal" means since
KUnit didn't support per-suite setup/teardown. So it manually called
internal kunit functions to run itself.
This has some downsides, like missing TAP headers => can't use kunit.py
to run or even parse the test results (w/o tweaks).
Use the newly added support and convert it over, adding a .kunitconfig
so it's even easier to run from kunit.py.
People can now run the test via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=mm/kfence --arch=x86_64
...
[11:02:32] Testing complete. Passed: 23, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0, Skipped: 2, Errors: 0
[11:02:32] Elapsed time: 43.562s total, 0.003s configuring, 9.268s building, 34.281s running
Cc: kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2: no change (see patch 2 and 4)
---
mm/kfence/.kunitconfig | 6 ++++++
mm/kfence/kfence_test.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 mm/kfence/.kunitconfig
diff --git a/mm/kfence/.kunitconfig b/mm/kfence/.kunitconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f3d65e939bfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/kfence/.kunitconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+CONFIG_KUNIT=y
+CONFIG_KFENCE=y
+CONFIG_KFENCE_KUNIT_TEST=y
+
+# Additional dependencies.
+CONFIG_FTRACE=y
diff --git a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
index 1b50f70a4c0f..96206a4ee9ab 100644
--- a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
+++ b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
@@ -826,14 +826,6 @@ static void test_exit(struct kunit *test)
test_cache_destroy();
}
-static struct kunit_suite kfence_test_suite = {
- .name = "kfence",
- .test_cases = kfence_test_cases,
- .init = test_init,
- .exit = test_exit,
-};
-static struct kunit_suite *kfence_test_suites[] = { &kfence_test_suite, NULL };
-
static void register_tracepoints(struct tracepoint *tp, void *ignore)
{
check_trace_callback_type_console(probe_console);
@@ -847,11 +839,7 @@ static void unregister_tracepoints(struct tracepoint *tp, void *ignore)
tracepoint_probe_unregister(tp, probe_console, NULL);
}
-/*
- * We only want to do tracepoints setup and teardown once, therefore we have to
- * customize the init and exit functions and cannot rely on kunit_test_suite().
- */
-static int __init kfence_test_init(void)
+static int kfence_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
/*
* Because we want to be able to build the test as a module, we need to
@@ -859,18 +847,25 @@ static int __init kfence_test_init(void)
* won't work here.
*/
for_each_kernel_tracepoint(register_tracepoints, NULL);
- return __kunit_test_suites_init(kfence_test_suites);
+ return 0;
}
-static void kfence_test_exit(void)
+static void kfence_suite_exit(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
- __kunit_test_suites_exit(kfence_test_suites);
for_each_kernel_tracepoint(unregister_tracepoints, NULL);
tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
}
-late_initcall_sync(kfence_test_init);
-module_exit(kfence_test_exit);
+static struct kunit_suite kfence_test_suite = {
+ .name = "kfence",
+ .test_cases = kfence_test_cases,
+ .init = test_init,
+ .exit = test_exit,
+ .suite_init = kfence_suite_init,
+ .suite_exit = kfence_suite_exit,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&kfence_test_suite);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>");
--
2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog
