Hi Jarkko, On 4/14/2022 4:25 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 14:10 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > IMHO, we can pull this after +1 version. I think I had only one nit > (one character to a struct name it was), and I've been testing this > series *extensively* with real-world code (wasm run-time that we are > developing), so I'm confident that it is *good enough*. Thank you very much. I am aware of other teams successfully building on and testing this work. I do hope that they could also provide an ack to help increase the confidence in this work. > > Reinette, for the EMODT patch, as long as you fix the struct name > you can add my reviewed-by and also tested-by to that patch before > you send it! It's so narrow change. Thank you. I will make the struct name change and also plan to make the same change to the function names in that patch to ensure that everything is consistent in that regard. Reinette
