There are some issues in parse_num_list():
First, the end variable is assigned twice when parsing_end is true, it is
unnecessary.
Second, the function does not check that parsing_end is false after parsing
argument. Thus, if the final part of the argument is something like '4-',
parse_num_list() will discard it instead of returning -EINVAL.
Clean up parse_num_list() and fix these issues.
Before:
$ ./test_progs -n 2,4-
#2 atomic_bounds:OK
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
After:
$ ./test_progs -n 2,4-
Failed to parse test numbers.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2: add more details to commit message
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
index 795b6798ccee..82f0e2d99c23 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
@@ -20,16 +20,16 @@ int parse_num_list(const char *s, bool **num_set, int *num_set_len)
if (errno)
return -errno;
- if (parsing_end)
- end = num;
- else
+ if (!parsing_end) {
start = num;
+ if (*next == '-') {
+ s = next + 1;
+ parsing_end = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
- if (!parsing_end && *next == '-') {
- s = next + 1;
- parsing_end = true;
- continue;
- } else if (*next == ',') {
+ if (*next == ',') {
parsing_end = false;
s = next + 1;
end = num;
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int parse_num_list(const char *s, bool **num_set, int *num_set_len)
set[i] = true;
}
- if (!set)
+ if (!set || parsing_end)
return -EINVAL;
*num_set = set;
--
2.35.1
