Re: [PATCH] selftests: net: fix warning when compiling selftest/net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/3/17 11:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:50:40 +0800 Guo Zhengkui wrote:
When I compile tools/testing/selftests/net/ by
`make -C tools/testing/selftests/net` with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0,
it reports the following warnings:

txtimestamp.c: In function 'validate_timestamp':
txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
{aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
    fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
                            ~~^
                            %llu
      cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
txtimestamp.c: In function '__print_ts_delta_formatted':
txtimestamp.c:173:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
{aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
    fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
                     ~~^      ~~~~~~~~
                     %llu
txtimestamp.c:175:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
{aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
    fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
                     ~~^
                     %llu

`int64_t` is the alias for `long long int`. '%lld' is more suitable.

That's on 32bit machines, I think what you need to use is PRId64.
Or just cast the result / change variable types to long long.

But it should be '%ld' instead of '%lu', right?

Zhengkui




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux