On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:36 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:08:29AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > +``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether, it will behave like > > > +``LLVM=1``. > > > > Hmm... I can see someone's build wrappers setting LLVM=1, then them > > being surprised that appending LLVM=0 doesn't disable LLVM=1 as they > > might expect. But Masahiro says let's fix this later which is fine. > > What happens if you say LLVM= instead of LLVM=0 ? Would that "undo" > a prior LLVM=1 and use GCC instead? I think so. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
