On 15/02/2022 10.54, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On 2/15/22 08:48, Thomas Huth wrote:Commit 2c212e1baedc ("KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest") fixed the behavior of the SIDA memops for normal guests. It would be nice to have a way to test whether the current kernel has the fix applied or not. Thus add a check to the KVM selftests for these two memops. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c index 9f49ead380ab..d19c3ffdea3f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c @@ -160,6 +160,21 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) run->psw_mask &= ~(3UL << (63 - 17)); /* Disable AR mode */ vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); /* Run to sync new state */ + /* Check that the SIDA calls are rejected for non-protected guests */ + ksmo.gaddr = 0; + ksmo.flags = 0; + ksmo.size = 8; + ksmo.op = KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ; + ksmo.buf = (uintptr_t)mem1; + ksmo.sida_offset = 0x1c0;What is the rational for that constant? Any would do, as long as size + offset < PAGE_SIZE, correct?
Right, it's rather a random value. Thomas
