Replace the PTR_EQ NULL checks wit the NULL macros. More idiomatic and specific. Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/mctp/test/route-test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mctp/test/route-test.c b/net/mctp/test/route-test.c index 750f9f9b4daf..eb70b524c78e 100644 --- a/net/mctp/test/route-test.c +++ b/net/mctp/test/route-test.c @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static void mctp_test_route_input_sk(struct kunit *test) } else { KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, rc, 0); skb2 = skb_recv_datagram(sock->sk, 0, 1, &rc); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, skb2, NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, skb2); } __mctp_route_test_fini(test, dev, rt, sock); @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void mctp_test_route_input_sk_reasm(struct kunit *test) skb_free_datagram(sock->sk, skb2); } else { - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, skb2, NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, skb2); } __mctp_route_test_fini(test, dev, rt, sock); -- 2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog