Re: [PATCH 2/3] list: test: Add a test for list_is_head()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 9:09 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 02:15:37PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > list_is_head() was added recently[1], and didn't have a KUnit test. The
> > implementation is trivial, so it's not a particularly exciting test, but
> > it'd be nice to get back to full coverage of the list functions.
> >
> > [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/include/linux/list.h?id=0425473037db40d9e322631f2d4dc6ef51f97e88
>
> ...
>
> > +static void list_test_list_is_head(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +     struct list_head a, b;
> > +
> > +     KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_head(&a, &a));
>
> OK.
>
> > +     KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_head(&a, &b));
>
> Perhaps OK, but the main case here is to test an (arbitrary) member of the existing list.
>

That makes sense. I've updated the test to verify both the case where
the elements are from the same list and where it's from a different
list:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220208040122.695258-2-davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

(I've also updated patch 3 for list_entry_is_head() similarly, which
was even worse before.)

> > +}
>

Cheers,
-- David

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux