Re: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation: dev-tools: clarify KTAP specification wording

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 4:32 AM <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Clarify some confusing phrasing.

Thanks for this! A few comments below:

>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> One item that may result in bikeshedding is that I added the spec
> version to the title line.

This is fine by me.

>
>  Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> index 878530cb9c27..3b7a26816930 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>  .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -========================================
> -The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP)
> -========================================
> +===================================================
> +The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP), version 1
> +===================================================
>
>  TAP, or the Test Anything Protocol is a format for specifying test results used
>  by a number of projects. It's website and specification are found at this `link
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ starting with another KTAP version line and test plan, and end with the overall
>  result. If one of the subtests fail, for example, the parent test should also
>  fail.
>
> -Additionally, all result lines in a subtest should be indented. One level of
> +Additionally, all lines in a subtest should be indented. One level of

The original reason for this is to accommodate "unknown" lines which
were not generated by the test itself (e.g, a KASAN report or BUG or
something). These are awkward, as sometimes they're a useful thing to
have as part of the test result, and sometimes they're unrelated spam.
(Additionally, I think kselftest will indent these, as it indents the
full results in a separate pass afterwards, but KUnit won't, as the
level of nesting is done during printing.)

Personally, I'd rather leave this as is, or perhaps call out "unknown"
lines explicitly, e.g:
Additionally, all lines in a subtest (except for 'unknown' lines)
should be indented...

Thoughts?

>  indentation is two spaces: "  ". The indentation should begin at the version
>  line and should end before the parent test's result line.
>
> @@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ Major differences between TAP and KTAP
>  --------------------------------------
>
>  Note the major differences between the TAP and KTAP specification:
> -- yaml and json are not recommended in diagnostic messages
> -- TODO directive not recognized
> +- yaml and json are not recommended in KTAP diagnostic messages
> +- TODO directive not recognized in KTAP
>  - KTAP allows for an arbitrary number of tests to be nested
>

Looks good here, cheers.


>  The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another
> --
> Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux