On 1/24/22 2:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 02:27:07PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 1/24/22 10:55 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
- ptrace_set_get_inherit(child, &vec_types[i]);
+ if (getauxval(vec_types[i].hwcap_type) & vec_types[i].hwcap) {
+ ptrace_set_get_inherit(child, &vec_types[i]);
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s SVE_PT_VL_INHERIT set\n",
+ vec_types[i].name);
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s SVE_PT_VL_INHERIT cleared\n",
+ vec_types[i].name);
These messages are a bit confusing. Are we skipping two tests?
ptrace_set_get_inherit() logs two test results (one for set, one for get).
Ah okay.
These messages can be combined into one like this one on lin 572:
ksft_test_result_skip("%s get/set VL %d\n", vec_types[i].name, vl);
If we do that then the number of planned tests won't line up with the
number of expected tests.
Sounds good. Assuming this is going through ARM tree?
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thanks,
-- Shuah
