On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:35 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Introduce a KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION for the likes of KUNIT_EXPECT_LT. > This is analagous to KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION. > > Note: this patch leaves the EQ/NE macros untouched since those share > some intermediate macros for the pointer-based macros. > > The current macro chain looks like: > KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG => KUNIT_BASE_LT_MSG_ASSERTION => KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION > KUNIT_EXPECT_GT_MSG => KUNIT_BASE_GT_MSG_ASSERTION => KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION > <ditto for LE, GE, and ASSERT variants> > > After this change: > KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG => KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION => KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION > KUNIT_EXPECT_GT_MSG => KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION => KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION > > I.e. we've traded all the unique intermediary macros for a single shared > KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION. The only difference is that users of > KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION also need to pass the operation (==, <, etc.). > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
