On 2021-12-17 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:32:24PM +0100, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
On 2021-12-17 2:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
+ for (i = 0; i < snd_ctl_elem_info_get_count(ctl->info); i++)
+ if (!ctl_value_index_valid(ctl, val, i))
+ valid = false;
Correct me I'm wrong, but it seems a 'return false' would suffice. Is the
continuation of looping still needed once a single check found above
evaluates to true?
Just read my initial message and clearly an 'if' : (. Sorry for the
confusion.
It doesn't affect the result of the test but it will cause us to print a
diagnostic message for each invalid value rather than just the first one
we see (eg, if both channels in a stereo control have an invalid value)
which seems like it's more helpful to people working with the output
than just the first error.
So there is a good reason to do so. And I agree with such approach.
Thanks for explaining, Mark!
Regards,
Czarek
