On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 06:54:37 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:58:27 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> > Hi Ye,
> >
> > On 10/12/2021 08:14, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Ye Guojin <ye.guojin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > 'sys/ioctl.h' included in 'mptcp_inq.c' is duplicated.
> >
> > Good catch, the modification looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > This patch is for "net-next" tree as it fixes an issue introduced by a
> > patch only in this tree:
> >
> > Fixes: b51880568f20 ("selftests: mptcp: add inq test case")
> >
> > Regarding the commit message, please next time include the Fixes tag and
> > mention for which tree it is for in the FAQ [1], e.g. [PATCH net-next].
> >
> >
> > @David/Jakub: do you prefer a v2 with these modifications or is it fine
> > to apply this small patch directly in net-next tree?
>
> v1 is fine. Let me apply it right away and do the edits before I forget
> they are needed..
Actually, I take that back, let's hear from Mat, he may want to take
the patch via his tree.
