On 08/12/2021 11:14, David Ahern wrote: > On 12/6/21 11:05 PM, lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> # TESTS=bind6 ./fcnal-test.sh >>> >>> ########################################################################### >>> IPv6 address binds >>> ########################################################################### >>> >>> >>> ################################################################# >>> No VRF >>> >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address - ns-A IPv6 [FAIL] > This one passes for me. Err, i didn't notice this one when i sent this mail. Since it was passed too in my previous multiple runs. > > Can you run the test with '-v -p'? -v will give you the command line > that is failing. -p will pause the tests at the failure. From there you > can do: > > ip netns exec ns-A bash > > Look at the routing - no VRF is involved so the address should be local > to the device and the loopback. Run the test manually to see if it > really is failing. thanks for your advice, i will take a look if it appears again. > > >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address after device bind - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address - ns-A loopback IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address after device bind - ns-A loopback IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to local address - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to local address after device bind - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to out of scope local address - ns-A loopback IPv6 [FAIL] > This one seems to be a new problem. The socket is bound to eth1 and the > address bind is to an address on loopback. That should not be working. My colleague had another thread with the verbose detailed message https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/PH0PR11MB4792DC680F7E383D72C2E8C5C56E9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > >>> ################################################################# >>> With VRF >>> >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address after vrf bind - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address after device bind - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address after vrf bind - VRF IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to local address after device bind - VRF IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: Raw socket bind to invalid local address after vrf bind - ns-A loopback IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to local address with VRF bind - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to local address with VRF bind - VRF IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to local address with device bind - ns-A IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to VRF address with device bind - VRF IPv6 [FAIL] > This failure is similar to the last one. Need to see if a recent commit > changed something. Good to know this Thanks Zhijian > > >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to invalid local address for VRF - ns-A loopback IPv6 [ OK ] >>> TEST: TCP socket bind to invalid local address for device bind - ns-A loopback IPv6 [ OK ] >> >> Thanks >> Zhijian >> >>
