On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 17:24 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/3/21 12:50 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 11:26 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On 11/24/21 5:56 PM, davidcomponentone@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > From: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The coccinelle report
> > > > ./tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c:285:54-59:
> > > > WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
> > > > ./tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c:207:54-59:
> > > > WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
> > > > Relational and logical operators evaluate to bool,
> > > > explicit conversion is overly verbose and unneeded.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> > > > index 584dc6bc3b06..d2917054fe3a 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> > > > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bool test_unpriv_remount(const char *fstype, const char *mount_options,
> > > > if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
> > > > die("child did not terminate cleanly\n");
> > > > }
> > > > - return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS ? true : false;
> > > > + return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > create_and_enter_userns();
> > > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static bool test_priv_mount_unpriv_remount(void)
> > > > if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
> > > > die("child did not terminate cleanly\n");
> > > > }
> > > > - return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS ? true : false;
> > > > + return WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > orig_mnt_flags = read_mnt_flags(orig_path);
> > > >
> > >
> > > This change doesn't look right. WEXITSTATUS(status) return could be
> > > > 1 or 0 or negative.
> >
> > The change is at least logically correct.
> >
> > And isn't WEXITSTATUS range limited from 0->255 ?
> >
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Exit-Status.html
> >
>
> You are right. In any case, I don't see any value in changing the current
> logic. The way it is coded is cryptic enough :)
Well, it'd be more like the rest of the kernel when changed.
bool function()
{
...
return <foo> ? true : false;
}
is pretty redundant.
