On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Software nodes allow us to represent hierarchies for device components
> that don't have their struct device representation yet - for instance:
> banks of GPIOs under a common GPIO expander. The core gpiolib core
core .. core ?!
> however doesn't offer any way of passing this information from the
> drivers.
>
> This extends struct gpio_chip with a pointer to fwnode that can be set
> by the driver and used to pass device properties for child nodes.
>
> This is similar to how we handle device-tree sub-nodes with
> CONFIG_OF_GPIO enabled.
Not sure I understand the proposal. Can you provide couple of (simplest)
examples?
And also it sounds like reinventing a wheel. What problem do you have that you
need to solve this way?
...
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)
> + if (gc->of_node && gc->fwnode) {
> + pr_err("%s: tried to set both the of_node and fwnode in gpio_chip\n",
> + __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF_GPIO */
I don't like this. It seems like a hack right now.
Is it possible to convert all GPIO controller drivers to provide an fwnode
rather than doing this? (I believe in most of the drivers we can drop
completely the of_node assignment).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
