We replace proto_ops whenever TLS is configured for RX. But our
replacement also overrides sendpage_locked, which will crash
unless TX is also configured. Similarly we plug both of those
in for TLS_HW (NIC crypto offload) even tho TLS_HW has a completely
different implementation for TX.
Last but not least we always plug in something based on inet_stream_ops
even though a few of the callbacks differ for IPv6 (getname, release,
bind).
Use a callback building method similar to what we do for struct proto.
Fixes: c46234ebb4d1 ("tls: RX path for ktls")
Fixes: d4ffb02dee2f ("net/tls: enable sk_msg redirect to tls socket egress")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/tls/tls_main.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index acfba9f1ba72..6bc2879ba637 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(tcpv6_prot_mutex);
static const struct proto *saved_tcpv4_prot;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(tcpv4_prot_mutex);
static struct proto tls_prots[TLS_NUM_PROTS][TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
-static struct proto_ops tls_sw_proto_ops;
+static struct proto_ops tls_proto_ops[TLS_NUM_PROTS][TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
static void build_protos(struct proto prot[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
const struct proto *base);
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ void update_sk_prot(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot,
&tls_prots[ip_ver][ctx->tx_conf][ctx->rx_conf]);
+ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_socket->ops,
+ &tls_proto_ops[ip_ver][ctx->tx_conf][ctx->rx_conf]);
}
int wait_on_pending_writer(struct sock *sk, long *timeo)
@@ -669,8 +671,6 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
if (tx) {
ctx->sk_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
sk->sk_write_space = tls_write_space;
- } else {
- sk->sk_socket->ops = &tls_sw_proto_ops;
}
goto out;
@@ -728,6 +728,39 @@ struct tls_context *tls_ctx_create(struct sock *sk)
return ctx;
}
+static void build_proto_ops(struct proto_ops ops[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
+ const struct proto_ops *base)
+{
+ ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE] = *base;
+
+ ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_BASE] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
+ ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_BASE].sendpage_locked = tls_sw_sendpage_locked;
+
+ ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW ] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
+ ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW ].splice_read = tls_sw_splice_read;
+
+ ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_SW ] = ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_BASE];
+ ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_SW ].splice_read = tls_sw_splice_read;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE
+ ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_BASE] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
+ ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_BASE].sendpage_locked = NULL;
+
+ ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_SW ] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW ];
+ ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_SW ].sendpage_locked = NULL;
+
+ ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_HW ] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW ];
+
+ ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_HW ] = ops[TLS_SW ][TLS_SW ];
+
+ ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_HW ] = ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_SW ];
+ ops[TLS_HW ][TLS_HW ].sendpage_locked = NULL;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_TLS_TOE
+ ops[TLS_HW_RECORD][TLS_HW_RECORD] = *base;
+#endif
+}
+
static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
{
int ip_ver = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TLSV6 : TLSV4;
@@ -739,6 +772,8 @@ static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
mutex_lock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
if (likely(prot != saved_tcpv6_prot)) {
build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV6], prot);
+ build_proto_ops(tls_proto_ops[TLSV6],
+ sk->sk_socket->ops);
smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv6_prot, prot);
}
mutex_unlock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
@@ -749,6 +784,8 @@ static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
mutex_lock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
if (likely(prot != saved_tcpv4_prot)) {
build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV4], prot);
+ build_proto_ops(tls_proto_ops[TLSV4],
+ sk->sk_socket->ops);
smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv4_prot, prot);
}
mutex_unlock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
@@ -959,10 +996,6 @@ static int __init tls_register(void)
if (err)
return err;
- tls_sw_proto_ops = inet_stream_ops;
- tls_sw_proto_ops.splice_read = tls_sw_splice_read;
- tls_sw_proto_ops.sendpage_locked = tls_sw_sendpage_locked;
-
tls_device_init();
tcp_register_ulp(&tcp_tls_ulp_ops);
--
2.31.1
