On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:12 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kyle thank you for your explanation of what breaks. For future kernels > I do need to do some work in this area and I will copy on the patches > going forward. In particular I strongly suspect that changing the > sigaction and blocked state of the signal for these synchronous signals > is the wrong thing to do, especially if the process is not killed. I > want to find another solution that does not break things but that also > does not change the program state behind the programs back so things > work differently under the debugger. The heads up in the future is appreciated, thanks. - Kyle
