On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:35 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:31 AM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > When building selftests/timens with clang, the compiler warn about the
> > function abs() see below:
> >
> > exec.c:33:8: error: absolute value function 'abs' given an argument of type 'long' but has parameter of type 'int' which may cause truncation of value [-Werror,-Wabsolute-value]
> > if (abs(tst.tv_sec - now.tv_sec) > 5)
> > ^
> > exec.c:33:8: note: use function 'labs' instead
> > if (abs(tst.tv_sec - now.tv_sec) > 5)
> > ^~~
> > labs
>
> Careful.
>
> Isn't the tv_sec member of `struct timespec` a `time_t` which is 32b
> on 32b hosts and 64b on 64b hosts? If I'm recalling that correctly,
> then this patch results in a harmless (though unnecessary) sign
> extension for 32b targets. That should be fine, but someone like Arnd
> should triple check if my concern is valid or not.
It could actually be 'int', 'long' or 'long long' depending on the architecture
and C library. Maybe we need a temporary variable of type 'long long'
to hold the difference, and pass that to llabs()?
Arnd
