It's possible that a parameterised test could end up with zero parameters. At the moment, the test function will nevertheless be called with NULL as the parameter. Instead, don't try to run the test code, and just mark the test as SKIPped. Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> --- lib/kunit/test.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 3bd741e50a2d..e028d98e4f5b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -500,7 +500,10 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_print_subtest_start(suite); kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { - struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; + /* The initial param value is nonzero, as we want + * non-parametrised tests to run once. + */ + struct kunit test = { .param_value = (void *)-1, .param_index = 0 }; struct kunit_result_stats param_stats = { 0 }; test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; @@ -510,7 +513,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); } - do { + while (test.param_value) { kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); if (test_case->generate_params) { @@ -530,11 +533,12 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) param_desc[0] = '\0'; test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc); test.param_index++; - } + } else + test.param_value = NULL; kunit_update_stats(¶m_stats, test.status); - } while (test.param_value); + } kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats); -- 2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog