On 9/14/2021 11:48 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Just in case, add a warning ensuring that on guest entry,
either both VMLOAD and VMSAVE intercept is enabled or
vVMLOAD/VMSAVE is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 861ac9f74331..deeebd05f682 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3784,6 +3784,12 @@ static __no_kcsan fastpath_t svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_apicv_activated(vcpu->kvm) != kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu));
+ /* Check that CVE-2021-3656 can't happen again */
+ if (!svm_is_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VMSAVE) ||
+ !svm_is_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VMSAVE))
either one needs to be INTERCEPT_VMLOAD, right?
+ WARN_ON(!(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext &
+ VIRTUAL_VMLOAD_VMSAVE_ENABLE_MASK));
+
sync_lapic_to_cr8(vcpu);
if (unlikely(svm->asid != svm->vmcb->control.asid)) {
