On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:14:16 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As for SVE we will track a per task SME vector length for tasks. Convert > > > the existing storage for the vector length into an array and update > > > fpsimd_flush_task() to initialise this in a function. > > > I'm clearly having a trivial comment day. Given reduction in indenting > > it would be nice perhaps to reformat comments to take that into account. > > Again I'll have done this to make it clearer that things are just being > moved about - as a reviewer I do find things like that very helpful. > > > I'm also unconvinced the trivial wrappers are worthwhile. (maybe you drop > > those later?) > > They do hide what we're doing from the rest of the series which makes > the whole thing a lot easier to work with, especially if we change what > data structures we use or there's some debate as to the names of the > constants. A bunch of them directly map onto existing trivial wrappers > too, there's been some stylistic preference for that. > > If people want to remove the wrappers I'd propose leaving them for now > then adding a patch afterwards which removes them, or at least waiting > until we've got very firm agreement from Catalin and Will on the data > structures and constants. > Makes sense. J