Hi David, > In any case, thanks a lot -- this is awesome. Oh neat, glad it's useful! I'm happy to keep hacking on this if it's in a direction that makes sense for kunit in general. As an approximate plan, I can fix the UML breakages, then work on some resulting simplifications for tree-wide initialisers (we'd no longer need the null-terminated arrays of suites everywhere, for example). Cheers, Jeremy
