On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:18:10AM +0000, Machnikowski, Maciej wrote: > Controlling the clock that actually drives any components (PHY/MAC) in > runtime can be a good way to brick the part. I didn't say that. > I feel that, while the reuse > of structures may be a good idea, the userspace API for clocks is not. > They are usually set up once at the board init level and stay like that "forever". > > The outputs we need to control are only a subset of all of them and they > rather fall in the PTP pins level of details, rather than clock ones. clk-gate.c clk-mux.c Making that available for user space to twiddle is a better way that tacking on to the PTP stuff. You can model your device as having a multiplexer in front of it. Thanks, Richard
