Context:
It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests.
Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful.
This patch:
* is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py
* adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list"
* for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>"
* leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch.
Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions.
Hack: we print a TAP header and fake test plan to allow kunit.py to
use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests.
Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for
now. Maybe in the future we ouptut each test as SKIPPED or the like.
Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might
eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g.
* perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing
* perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed
* perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch
hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b"
Tested:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit
...
TAP version 14
1..1
example.example_simple_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
reboot: System halted
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/kunit/executor.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 50aa73ebe0e6..4a3dd7c05245 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -202,9 +202,35 @@ static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set)
pr_info("1..%d\n", num_of_suites);
}
-int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
+static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
+{
+ struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
+
+ kunit_print_tap_header(suite_set);
+
+ for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
+ __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
+}
+
+static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
{
+ unsigned int i;
struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
+ struct kunit_case *test_case;
+
+ /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
+ kunit_print_tap_header(suite_set);
+
+ for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
+ for (i = 0; (*suites)[i] != NULL; i++) {
+ kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites)[i], test_case) {
+ pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)[i]->name, test_case->name);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
+{
struct suite_set suite_set = {
.start = __kunit_suites_start,
.end = __kunit_suites_end,
@@ -213,10 +239,12 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
if (filter_glob_param)
suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param);
- kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
-
- for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
- __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
+ if (!action_param)
+ kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set);
+ else if (strcmp(action_param, "list") == 0)
+ kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set);
+ else
+ pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param);
if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each array */
kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
--
2.33.0.309.g3052b89438-goog
