On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 at 10:08, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:34:58PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > On 8/24/21 2:34 PM, Leonard Crestez wrote: > > > The crypto_shash API is used in order to compute packet signatures. The > > > API comes with several unfortunate limitations: > > > > > > 1) Allocating a crypto_shash can sleep and must be done in user context. > > > 2) Packet signatures must be computed in softirq context > > > 3) Packet signatures use dynamic "traffic keys" which require exclusive > > > access to crypto_shash for crypto_setkey. > > > > > > The solution is to allocate one crypto_shash for each possible cpu for > > > each algorithm at setsockopt time. The per-cpu tfm is then borrowed from > > > softirq context, signatures are computed and the tfm is returned. > > > > > > > I could not see the per-cpu stuff that you mention in the changelog. > > Perhaps it's time we moved the key information from the tfm into > the request structure for hashes? Or at least provide a way for > the key to be in the request structure in addition to the tfm as > the tfm model still works for IPsec. Ard/Eric, what do you think > about that? > I think it makes sense for a shash desc to have the ability to carry a key, which will be used instead of the TFM key, but this seems like quite a lot of work, given that all implementations will need to be updated. Also, setkey() can currently sleep, so we need to check whether the existing key manipulation code can actually execute during init/update/final if sleeping is not permitted.
